New coconut planting devices! - Nouveaux dispositifs de plantation


After a brief presentation of conventional planting devices, we analyze a new group coconut plantation device (G3PH). We come to the conclusion that the planting density proposed so far is excessive. We then proposes various innovative solutions. Some consist only of separating groups of coconut palms in order to reach more appropriate planting densities. Others then explore various planting arrangements in groups of three or four coconut palms (G4K1, G3K1), with the progressive elimination of the least productive coconut palms to increase the genetic value and the productivity of the plantation. Finally, it specifies the situations in which these group planting systems are most appropriate, and the increases in yield or resilience that can be expected.

For illustrating this section, we can produce on request at least one large size HD poster (up to 180x100 cm in size). Such poster should be adapted to each country, on a case-by-case basis.

©R. Bourdeix, 2021, section CACE.

1.Conventional planting systems

In large plantations, there is an advantage in providing continuous picking of the entire plantation, which requires the provision of roads and tracks with widths corresponding to the spacing of lines of coconut trees. Possible options are as follows:

  • Square system – Palms are set at fixed equal distance at the corner of each square, the distance between palms in each row and the distance between adjacent rows being the same.
  • Triangular system – Palms are set at fixed distance at the corners of an equilateral triangle. About 15% more palms can be accommodated per unit area under this system, and this is the most common method presently used for both coconut and oil palm.
  • Rectangular system – Rows are set at right angles to one another but the distance between the palms in the row is closer than those between the rows. This system provides for a slightly lower number of palms in a stand but allows for more room for growing intercrops.
  • Plantation along geographical contour lines in slopes submitted to erosion.
  • Quincunx system – This system is used for replanting old coconut plantations where the old palms will be removed as soon as the new seedlings are established. Seedlings are planted in the center of each square of old palms.
  • As shown in the drawing hereunder, they are more planting designs, generally used for intercropping. 

2. The new method G3PH "Group of three palms per hill".

This method seems to have many advantages, as shown in a video, posted by Louise Adams, environmental adviser at the Union Wallonne des Entreprises, University of Louvain, Belgium. It seems that the technique was first developed in the Philippines (to be confirmed). 


In 2018, we were surprised to observe this planting design
 in the Dominican Republic. It was planted long before
the related video and papers are published,
which shows that imaginative and enterprising farmers
can have the same great ideas!

Nevertheless, the analysis conducted by the expert, provided under, seems to indicates that the design proposed in this video use an excessive planting density.


Representation of the G3PH planting design
as proposed by Louise Adams

In the GPH3 model, this calculation indicates that, with a distance of 10 m between the groups, the plantation density is 303 palm trees per hectare. According to the expert's opinion, this density is far too high: the coconut palms will compete with each other, compete for water, soil nutrients and light, increase their vertical growth and reduce their fruit production. They will intercept almost all light, making intercropping as adults nearly impossible. Soil will deplete from overuse. The optimum density for tall type varieties is 143 palms per hectare. The optimum density for hybrids is 160 to 180 palms per hectare.

3. Improvement of the G3PH model proposed by Louise Adams

We have studied various possibilities to reduce planting density. One possibility would be, for example, to leave a distance of 12.5 m between groups of three palm trees. Thus, the hectare will include 9x9 groups of 3 palm trees minus 48 border palms (18 at the top, 9 at the bottom, 21 on the side). This corresponds to a density of 195 palms, which again exceeds the normal density for Tall type coconut palms.
If a distance of 14.3 m separates the groups of three palms, the hectare will contain 8x8 groups. Excluding border palms, this corresponds to a final density of 150 palms per hectare, a density close to that generally used for tall coconut palms. This is the expert recommended spacing method for the GPH3 design.

Représentation d'un hectare de plantation G3PH
avec un espacement de 14.3 m entre les groupes d'arbres

The G3PH planting scheme with a distance of 14.3 m between groups of palm trees corresponds to a density of 150 palm trees per hectare. According to the experts, the three palms of the same group could be planted closer to the distance of 2 m recommended in GPH3. Even when multiple shoots emerge from the same coconut, the resulting palms bend and move away from each other.

3. Towards new planting designs: G4K1? G3K1?

In February 2018, Dr R. Bourdeix formulated another related method by merging two concepts, This method could be even more efficient than the GP3H method. It is yet never tested, but it could be the best planting technique for coconut-based inter cropping.

The first concept came up when studying the methods for selecting parent palms in Tall-type populations. It appears that most of the methods used in the Pacific region for selecting parent palms are only conservative, meaning that the progeny has the same genetic value than the parent palms. With Vijendra Kumar from Fiji, we proposed a better method for selecting parent palms. This method, based on fruit analysis, allows a genetic progress of 5 to 10% on the progeny. Even if this better method is applied, the genetic progress will so remain quite limited. But: If the efficiency of selection on parent palms remain limited, when the palms are planted and start to produce, it is much more easy to see which ones are the good producers and which one are the bad producers. So the first concept was to plant about 33% more coconut palms than initially planted (plant 4 instead of 3), and to kill 25 % of the worst palms during the first years of production (From 4 kill 1). By this way, the farmer will avoid the burden of keeping in her/his farm the less productive coconut palms and for 50 years. When the farmer will reproduce its coconut palms, the worst palms will be excluded from pollination, giving a better progeny for future plantations.

The second concept is G3PH, "Group of three palms per hill" as described up. in G3PH, palms are planted three by three in a triangle design, at a 2 m distance, and each triangle is located at a 10 m distance from the next triangle by in a global square design.

Merging the two concepts suggests a new technique: to plant groups of 4 palms, at each corner in a square design sized  1.8 m. The centre of each 4-palms square is located at a 10 m distance from the centre of next 4-palms square in a global square design. The palms are planted and carefully observed by the farmers. Then, after 4 to 7 years of planting, farmers make decision and kill one palm (the less productive) in each of the square groups of 4 palms.  Coconut hearts and leaves of the killed palms can be used by the farmer or sold..


.Back to Nomenclature (in english) 

Back to main menu (in english)